Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 12:28
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Thank you.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What’s one positive trait you’ve gained because of BPD?
What’s next?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
NASA’s CODEX Captures Unique Views of Sun’s Outer Atmosphere - NASA Science (.gov)
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
20-Year Mystery of The Muon's Wiggle May Finally Be Solved - ScienceAlert
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
‘Strawberry Moon’ June 2025: See The Lowest Full Moon Since 2006 - Forbes
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?